[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Three unsolvable Problems Printer II





On 27 Jul 2022, at 23:42, Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> wrote:

On Wed 27 Jul 2022 at 22:39:56 +0100, Gareth Evans wrote:

On Wed 27 Jul 2022, at 22:28, Gareth Evans <donotspam@fastmail.fm> wrote:
On 25 Jul 2022, at 13:03, Schwibinger Michael <hbss@hotmail.com> wrote:

Hello
Ist the best way to repair
the self check?

HP 600

Hi Sophie, please would you confirm the exact model - eg Deskjet 600, OfficeJet 600, something else?

If you can't tell from looking at the machine, then running the command

lpinfo -v

...that perhaps should have been...

sudo lpinfo -v

lpinfo is not in a user's path. Use /usr/sbin/lpinfo.

The main point is that self-checking is a printer function, not a
printing system function. The question does not have an answer within
Debian.


Hi Brian,

My understanding is that self-check (where available) and test page printing are distinct processes, which may have been conflated here to some extent.

I recall having a printer with self check capability where no feedback was reported (on windows, ages ago) if there were no problems.

No disagreement re the independence of self checking functionality, but the command still has to be properly transmitted to the right endpoint.  My printer doesn't have a self check facility so I can't explore if/how that works with a  fax printer under different setup conditions.

If the printer concerned is an OfficeJet 600, that is fax capable according to hp docs


in which case, I think it's possible this  may be another case of the driverless+fax bug, where all jobs seem to end up in the outgoing fax queue and nothing prints, unless the queue was added via lpadmin. This does seem to be Bullseye-cups-related.

I don't know yet if this printer supports driverless printing, or if driverless printing is in use, but the lack of test page output alone doesn't seem to reliably indicate a hardware or external-to-Debian problem.

Just a thought, or three.

Best wishes,
Gareth


Reply to: