[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Manners [ was Re: 'Hoping people won't *who-ha* too much']




On 2021-08-07 12:11 p.m., Brian wrote:
> On Sat 07 Aug 2021 at 10:13:15 -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 2021-08-07 10:05 a.m., Brian wrote:
>>> On Sat 07 Aug 2021 at 16:36:19 +0300, ellanios82 wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> : https://www.merriam-webster.com/
>>>
>>> [Snipped]
>>>
>>> The point of your posting appears to be to point out a user's 
>>> spelling mistake. Maybe he is grateful for the uinsolicited
>>> advice but it is regarded as bad manners on this list. Please
>>> refrain.
>>>
>>
>> Being irrelevant is considered bad manners in all community. So maybe
>> you shall police yourself *before* looking to comment on others behavior.
>>
>> There's nothing *bad* in this explanation as it's only popular culture
>> explained. Nothing more, nothing less, nothing hidden and no *angry mob*
>> except maybe you that has the a limited tolerance. Don't worry, autistic
>> type of person are loved on this list. We accept that for you it may be
>> hard to understand all the magnitude behind act of language.
> 
> So, so interesting: Don't address the actual point made but go for
> the person. Having diagnosed my condition, can one expect more
> condiderate and sympathetic treatment in the future?
> 
Indeed yes, you'll get appropriate treatment for your condition.
I first suggest you read the book "Psychiatric Slavery" authored by
Thomas Szasz. I think this will be a good start on a new road.

-- 
Polyna-Maude R.-Summerside
-Be smart, Be wise, Support opensource development

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: