Re: APT Sources.list Line Format for Security Updates

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: APT Sources.list Line Format for Security Updates
From: Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 17:04:43 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] bfbf306c-e354-11eb-9b6a-00163eeb5320@msgid.mathom.us>
Mail-followup-to: debian-user@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] YOym9HwfjrGAERnO@wooledge.org>
References: <[🔎] MN2PR04MB6672C9048A69E321F366D9E289159@MN2PR04MB6672.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> <[🔎] YOym9HwfjrGAERnO@wooledge.org>

On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 04:32:52PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:

Try both and see which one works.  If the wiki is wrong, edit the wiki so
that it's correct.  (Then hope some jerk doesn't revert your changes.)


There's only one person acting like a jerk here.

Reply to:

References:
- APT Sources.list Line Format for Security Updates
  - From: Gregory McPherran <GMcPherran@outlook.com>
- Re: APT Sources.list Line Format for Security Updates
  - From: Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org>

Prev by Date: Re: APT Sources.list Line Format for Security Updates
Next by Date: Re: Offensive variable names [was: Cool down ...]
Previous by thread: Re: APT Sources.list Line Format for Security Updates
Next by thread: APT Sources.list Line Format for Security Updates - Documentation Discrepancy
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread