Re: "ls -d" OK, but not "ls"
On 2021-06-23 16:26:10 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2021-06-23 10:11:57 -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> > It could be useful to check on this with other tools. For a start, what
> > does
> >
> > $ stat /etc/systemd/
> >
> > report?
>
> File: /etc/systemd/
> Size: 0 Blocks: 8 IO Block: 4096 directory
> Device: 17h/23d Inode: 118 Links: 3
> Access: (0755/drwxr-xr-x) Uid: ( 0/ root) Gid: ( 0/ root)
> Access: 2021-04-19 09:40:10.717284464 +0200
> Modify: 2021-04-19 09:40:41.893170056 +0200
> Change: 2021-04-19 09:40:41.941169879 +0200
> Birth: -
And while I'm at it, "strace" gives:
[...]
stat("/etc/systemd", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=0, ...}) = 0
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/etc/systemd", O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK|O_CLOEXEC|O_DIRECTORY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
[...]
So, on the same directory, "stat" succeeds, but not "openat".
--
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
Reply to: