[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: thunderbird



On 31/5/21 4:24 am, Bret Busby wrote:
On 31/5/21 2:29 am, fxkl47BF wrote:
for a few decades i have used pine/alpine.
i'm considering a new mail application.
there are more out there than you can shake a stick at.
what are your thoughts of thunderbird.


I use thunderbird for skimming through incoming email before downloading it, to deal with messages that may need quick responses, but thunderbird often crashes, sometimes causing system crashes, because of malicious javascripts in it "error - unresponsive script" - which happens every day or so, if the application is not closed immediately after skimming through the new incoming messages. And, as said, it can cause system crashes. It is quick and very dirty.

I also use claws mail for one account, that rarely has traffic. But, claws mail is not easy to use, in terms of transferring messages from one installation to another; its folder management is not very good.

I use alpine, and have been using alpine, and, before that, pine, for about thirty years. I was using it before the Internet existed. I have not found any email application that is as powerful, sturdy, and reliable, as alpine/pine, and, alpine/pine is the safest email application, insofar as I am aware.


Oh, and, in case you are not already aware, the two thunderbird mailing lists apparently comprise of users only, whereas the alpine mailing list includes the developer, who is active on the list, and, seeks input from users, including for prospective changes, whereas some of the changes that are proposed for thunderbird, are simply "like it or lump it - this is what we will do / have done", and, intended changes to be implemented in the next version of thunderbird, are not wanted, by a number of current thunderbird users.

--
Bret Busby
Armadale
West Australia
(UTC+0800)
..............


Reply to: