Re: [OFFTOPIC] Re: [?] Why should Distros be called as i386 for a 32-bit PC, and as amd64 for a 64-bit PC, when Intel Core PCs are also 64bit systems

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [OFFTOPIC] Re: [?] Why should Distros be called as i386 for a 32-bit PC, and as amd64 for a 64-bit PC, when Intel Core PCs are also 64bit systems
From: <tomas@tuxteam.de>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 09:10:13 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20210316081013.GA28841@tuxteam.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20210315220851.v2npy3p3yueag777@acr13.nuvreauspam>
References: <[🔎] CAEG4cZUCTRc8PR3B+ytmdyhY=VxwqSCJpHpjVePDJf1oEpkXQQ@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 604DF13D.1050306@fastmail.fm> <[🔎] 20210314114415.uvjcfzchopjzw4qe@acr13.nuvreauspam> <[🔎] 6h3noph200h3v8@mids.svenhartge.de> <[🔎] jwvk0q9zhxc.fsf-monnier+gmane.linux.debian.user@gnu.org> <[🔎] 20210315084127.oujmr6kryjbpgmrl@acr13.nuvreauspam> <[🔎] jwv35wwwj9h.fsf-monnier+gmane.linux.debian.user@gnu.org> <[🔎] 20210315220851.v2npy3p3yueag777@acr13.nuvreauspam>

On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 12:08:51AM +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Lu, 15 mar 21, 11:19:55, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > 
> > Last I heard Debian works on the M1 already :-), but its Emacs package
> > doesn't :-(
> 
> No surprise considering Emacs is itself a full OS :p
> 
> (sorry, could not resist)

  https://www.informatimago.com/linux/emacs-on-user-mode-linux.html

:-)

Cheers
 - t

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

References:
- [?] Why should Distros be called as i386 for a 32-bit PC, and as amd64 for a 64-bit PC, when Intel Core PCs are also 64bit systems
  - From: "Susmita/Rajib" <bkpsusmitaa@gmail.com>
- Re: [?] Why should Distros be called as i386 for a 32-bit PC, and as amd64 for a 64-bit PC, when Intel Core PCs are also 64bit systems
  - From: The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm>
- Re: [?] Why should Distros be called as i386 for a 32-bit PC, and as amd64 for a 64-bit PC, when Intel Core PCs are also 64bit systems
  - From: Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com>
- Re: [?] Why should Distros be called as i386 for a 32-bit PC, and as amd64 for a 64-bit PC, when Intel Core PCs are also 64bit systems
  - From: Sven Hartge <sven@svenhartge.de>
- [OFFTOPIC] Re: [?] Why should Distros be called as i386 for a 32-bit PC, and as amd64 for a 64-bit PC, when Intel Core PCs are also 64bit systems
  - From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Re: [?] Why should Distros be called as i386 for a 32-bit PC, and as amd64 for a 64-bit PC, when Intel Core PCs are also 64bit systems
  - From: Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com>
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Re: [?] Why should Distros be called as i386 for a 32-bit PC, and as amd64 for a 64-bit PC, when Intel Core PCs are also 64bit systems
  - From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Re: [?] Why should Distros be called as i386 for a 32-bit PC, and as amd64 for a 64-bit PC, when Intel Core PCs are also 64bit systems
  - From: Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [EVEN MORE OFFTOPIC] Re: [?] Why should Distros be called as i386 for a 32-bit PC, and as amd64 for a 64-bit PC, when Intel Core PCs are also 64bit systems
Next by Date: Debian VMs on a routed libvirt IPv6 ULA network are not exchanging neighbor sollicitations with the host
Previous by thread: Re: [OFFTOPIC] Re: [?] Why should Distros be called as i386 for a 32-bit PC, and as amd64 for a 64-bit PC, when Intel Core PCs are also 64bit systems
Next by thread: Re: [?] Why should Distros be called as i386 for a 32-bit PC, and as amd64 for a 64-bit PC, when Intel Core PCs are also 64bit systems
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread