[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [?] Why should Distros be called as i386 for a 32-bit PC, and as amd64 for a 64-bit PC, when Intel Core PCs are also 64bit systems



On 14/03/2021 07:49, Susmita/Rajib wrote:
While Intel PCs are also 64bit processors?

For instance, my current laptop is Lenovo IdeaPad 320-15ISK 80XH01FKIN
15.6-inch Laptop (6th Gen Core i3-6006U/4GB/2TB/Integrated Graphics),
a 64bit processor.

It can't be that intellectuals, technocrats and cognitive elites
involved in the development of this complete OS+packages could be
misplaced in their perceptions. This is impossible.

So why such naming?

Could I be educated in this regard please?

Because AMD was first in developing what is now known as amd64; at the time Intel was pursuing its non-i386-compatible architecture ia64. Later it also implemented the same architecture as AMD, but the name was stuck.

I believe the i in i386 and similar stands for Intel, and yet several other companies also made i386 chips.


--
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
eduardo@kalinowski.com.br


Reply to: