[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Missing i915 activity at boot time



Hi,

I have recently got a laptop with Intel UHD620 integrated graphics.

The laptop was shipped with Debian 10.4 installed.

The output of dmesg, as shipped, contained these messages regarding i915:

# dmesg | grep -i i915
[    2.215117] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] VT-d active for gfx access
[    2.215212] i915 0000:00:02.0: vgaarb: deactivate vga console
[    2.216629] i915 0000:00:02.0: vgaarb: changed VGA decodes: olddecodes=io+mem,decodes=io+mem:owns=io+mem
[    2.216651] i915 0000:00:02.0: firmware: failed to load i915/kbl_dmc_ver1_04.bin (-2)
[    2.216655] i915 0000:00:02.0: Direct firmware load for i915/kbl_dmc_ver1_04.bin failed with error -2
[    2.216656] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] Failed to load DMC firmware i915/kbl_dmc_ver1_04.bin. Disabling runtime power management.
[    2.216656] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] DMC firmware homepage: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/firmware/linux-firmware.git/tree/i915
[    3.394853] [drm] Initialized i915 1.6.0 20200515 for 0000:00:02.0 on minor 0
[    3.416309] fbcon: i915drmfb (fb0) is primary device
[    3.443643] i915 0000:00:02.0: fb0: i915drmfb frame buffer device
[    4.263369] snd_hda_intel 0000:00:1f.3: bound 0000:00:02.0 (ops i915_audio_component_bind_ops [i915])


Now, I am in the process of installing Debian 10.6 in the same laptop (a new install, not upgrade). But cannot get the graphical environment up and running.

The only message related to i915 reported by dmesg currently is:

# dmesg | grep -i i915
[    4.709347] snd_hda_codec_hdmi hdaudioC0D2: No i915 binding for Intel HDMI/DP codec

Unfortunately, I do not have enough background to understand why I am not getting similar messages than the ones I got previously, but I guess this lack of "i915 activity" at boot time could be related to the problems I am facing to start Xorg.

Any hints would be appreciated.

Thanks.

Rafa.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: