On Du, 05 apr 20, 07:35:00, Carl Fink wrote: > On Sun, Apr 05, 2020 at 09:12:54AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > > > Please post the output of > > > > update-alternatives --config x-www-browser > > carlf@debian-NUCi5:~$ update-alternatives --config x-www-browser > There are 4 choices for the alternative x-www-browser (providing /usr/bin/x-www-browser). > > Selection Path Priority Status > ------------------------------------------------------------ > * 0 /usr/bin/epiphany-browser 85 auto mode > 1 /usr/bin/chromium 40 manual mode > 2 /usr/bin/epiphany-browser 85 manual mode > 3 /usr/bin/firefox 20 manual mode > 4 /usr/bin/surf 30 manual mode > > Press <enter> to keep the current choice[*], or type selection number: > > > > Note that the current selection 3 was added after I posted (by manually > creating a .desktop file). And that doing that had no effect on how rclone > reacted--it still tried to launch a nonexistent firefox-esr. The output above shows epiphany-browser as being the current selection. Maybe rclone is not using x-www-browser, but some other mechanism (or just hardcodes firefox). Kind regards, Andrei -- http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature