Question regarding an ACPI BIOS Error (bug)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Hi all, I've been redirected to this list while using reportbug. I would gladly accept some help regarding the determination of the Debian package responsible for those traces during boot:
[ 0.410073] ACPI: Added _OSI(Processor Device)
[ 0.410073] ACPI: Added _OSI(3.0 _SCP Extensions)
[ 0.410073] ACPI: Added _OSI(Processor Aggregator Device)
[ 0.410073] ACPI: Added _OSI(Linux-Dell-Video)
[ 0.410073] ACPI: Added _OSI(Linux-Lenovo-NV-HDMI-Audio)
[ 0.410073] ACPI: Added _OSI(Linux-HPI-Hybrid-Graphics)
[ 0.457794] ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Failure creating named object [\_GPE._E4A], AE_ALREADY_EXISTS (20190816/dswload2-323)
[ 0.457802] ACPI Error: AE_ALREADY_EXISTS, During name lookup/catalog (20190816/psobject-220)
[ 0.457805] ACPI: Skipping parse of AML opcode: OpcodeName unavailable (0x0014)
[ 0.457807] ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Failure creating named object [\_GPE._E47], AE_ALREADY_EXISTS (20190816/dswload2-323)
[ 0.457811] ACPI Error: AE_ALREADY_EXISTS, During name lookup/catalog (20190816/psobject-220)
[ 0.457813] ACPI: Skipping parse of AML opcode: OpcodeName unavailable (0x0014)
[ 0.458226] ACPI: 10 ACPI AML tables successfully acquired and loaded
[ 0.459880] ACPI: EC: EC started
[ 0.459881] ACPI: EC: interrupt blocked
[ 0.461706] ACPI: \: Used as first EC
[ 0.461708] ACPI: \: GPE=0x27, EC_CMD/EC_SC=0x66, EC_DATA=0x62
[ 0.461708] ACPI: EC: Boot ECDT EC used to handle transactions
Using apt and apt-file, I found numerous packages related to ACPI and there are also a few kernel modules dedicated to ACPI (in the last case I would say the package is linux-image-5.4.0-4-amd64 version 5.4.19-1 since I'm running a Debian testing) so I'm not sure of the package name I should use to report this issue.
Regards,
-- Raphaël BAZAUD
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: ProtonMail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=Pksl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: