[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: *nix



On Sb, 15 feb 20, 20:17:07, Charles Curley wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Feb 2020 14:03:02 -0700
> ghe <ghe@slsware.net> wrote:
> 
> > Until recently, the *nix communities have stuck pretty well to these
> > recommendations -- they're just descriptions of competent programming,
> > after all. There may be some discussion over the definitions of "one
> > thing" and "well" but there is software in our Linux that, I think,
> > doesn't conform to anybody's understanding of these maxims.
> 
> And then there are the exceptions that illustrate the rule. Emacs,
> LibreOffice and systemd (all of which I use, not necessarily
> enthusiastically) come to mind.

... as well as Linux (the kernel), grub, u-boot, busybox, GCC, vim, 
apache / nginx, mc, (neo)mutt, etc. and that is not even including GUI 
programs.

If you truly believe in this principle without any exception throw away 
your Swiss army knife / Leatherman now.

Kind regards,
Andrei
-- 
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: