[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: System on a chip - performance relative size and setup (how can the (Debian) setup make a difference?)



Hi David, time is my main constraint. I'm soon going to have none left for evaluating benchmarks. I think a better use of available time would be to start fundraising to get Teres-I boot without micro SD. But then I don't know if the ethical case for that laptop is strong enough compared to other pressing needs of the community. My use case seems minimal and/or unrealistic. Best regards. //Erik

On 22 June 2019 01:00:51 CEST, David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> wrote:
On 6/21/19 12:28 AM, Erik Josefsson wrote:
Hi David,

On 6/19/19 3:38 AM, David Christensen wrote:

The best way to answer your question regarding performance of a size N
SD card vs. a size 2*N SD card is to buy two cards and benchmark them
using your workload.  Please publish your findings.

Please find my four (4) findings below or at
http://paste.debian.net/1088723

The only benchmark I know how to use is flashbench. But unfortunately I
don't know how to interpret the resulting data.

I would be immensely grateful for advise on which of the 4 cards to use.

The testing was simple. I have downloaded and put the same copy of the
redpill RC3 image from http://box.redpill.dk/nonfree/ onto each SD card,
then I have followed the instructions. Each card now has an "Extended
system" created by the command box-add-gui on the same machine.

Then I have installed aptitude, run update and upgrade and autoclean,
and then installed and run flashbench with parameters: flashbench -a
/dev/mmcblk0 --blocksize=1024

The four cards are:

MicroSD SanDisk Extreme PRO  64GB  [3]  XC II
MicroSD SanDisk Extreme PLUS  64GB  [3]  XC I  V30  A2
MicroSD SanDisk Extreme PLUS  32GB  [3]  HC I  V30  A1
MicroSD SanDisk Ultra  32GB  [1]  HC I  (10)  A1

I can send a picture of the cards off list if this is unclear.

So the question is, which card should I use for Teres-I ?

If there are further benchmarks or tests that could help determine which
SD card is the best, I'd be happy to run them.

Best regards.

//Erik
<snip>

I'm not familiar with flashbench. Every tool has a learning curve; it's
up to you to decide how much effort you want to put into it.


When I wrote "benchmark them using your workload", I was thinking
"install Debian, install your apps, run your apps, quantify what you
can". If you're doing command-line stuff, the 'time' built-in for Bash
can be very useful. But, it's also good to get a subjective feel for
the system on the various media -- does it lag? Does it stutter/
freeze? Does it crash?


I found that Debian and FreeBSD on SanDisk Ultra Fit 16 GB USB 3.0 flash
drives was "good enough" for headless servers, but stuttered/ froze for
interactive graphical desktop use (during disk I/O; especially writes).
I have since migrated to used 16 GB SSD's. (Does your target hardware
have a SATA port?)


David


--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Reply to: