[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: konquerer access to Stretch with fish or sftp not working



Am Mittwoch, 12. Juni 2019, 21:53:28 CEST schrieb Étienne Mollier:
> Thomas, on 2019-06-12 :

> Hmn, I spent a bit of time to check that both sftp in command
> line, and konqueror (independently of fish:// or sftp:// URL)
> were using the same file $HOME/.ssh/known_hosts.  Unless the
> HOME variable differs, the known_hosts file is used in all
> cases.
> 
> Your use of a hash "#" as a prompt suggests you launched your
> sftp command line as the administrative user "root".  In the
> meantime your konqueror instance is probably running as your
> regular user account.  Was the fish:// connection attempt done
> on the same konqueror window as the sftp:// attempt?  If not,
> maybe you just need to cleanup your host key for your regular
> user account too.

Hi,
yes, it was same konquerer window

now , again fresh tried: konquerer window fresh open, same tab

## fish://root@192.168.1.20 			# OK

## sftp://root@192.168.1.20 		# NOT OK
error message is short translated:
did not find host key
but other type of key existing
may be hacker try to change key


konsole in user mode (NOT root)
(1) # sftp 192.168.1.20
The authenticity of host '192.168.1.20 (192.168.1.20)' can't be established.
ECDSA key fingerprint is SHA256:+KS/FE5iyW7zLmLcZ2OnIWTZ1BmtvA0F/4WBLUrs4bM.
Are you sure you want to continue connecting (yes/no)? 

(there might be an difference because user name on server and PC are 
different)

(2) # sftp thomas@192.168.1.20
thomas@192.168.1.20's password:

(3) # sftp root@192.168.1.20                                                                                                                      
root@192.168.1.20's password:                                                                                                                                   


konsole in user mode ROOT
working in all cases!
sftp 192.168.1.20,  thomas@192.168.1.20, sftp root@192.168.1.20                                                                                                                      

Sorry, thats now gets confusing...

Thanks...
Thomas



Reply to: