On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 08:26:12AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 09:22:02AM +0200, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote: > > Getty stayed the parent of that whole session "process > > tree", which at the end of the session folded nicely back. > > On termination of getty's child, getty itself terminated. > > I'm pretty sure getty has always used exec() to replace itself with > login(1) or a login(1) equivalent. There's no reason for it to sit > around holding memory. Makes sense, yes. Cheers -- t
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature