Re: DMARC reports after emails sent to list
Hellow Andrew!!!
Andrew McGlashan <andrew.mcglashan@affinityvision.com.au> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I have DMARC with DKIM and SPF setup for my domain name.
There was related discussion: it's very seriosus...
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=754809
>
> When I sent emails to Debian lists, I tend to get a bunch of DMARC
> reports as a result. The reports of concern are ones that show a
> sending IP for my domain that is the IP of the Debian mail server for
> the list.
>
> Is this due to email forwarding by Debian servers or is it for some
> other reason? How can I fix this?
>
> Do I need to add Debian's IP address to my SPF record? I'm not sure I
> want to, but it may end the DMARC reports with failed SPF tests...
>
>
>
> Here is the output from a report:
>
> $ zcat
> noloop.tana.it\!affinityvision.com.au\!1570838400\!1570924800\!e4b6e7354
> eab4dd19d4c5016fd8a34e2.xml.gz
>
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
> <feedback>
> <report_metadata>
> <org_name>tana.it</org_name>
> <email>postmaster@noloop.tana.it</email>
> <report_id>e4b6e7354eab4dd19d4c5016fd8a34e2</report_id>
> <date_range>
> <begin>1570838400</begin>
> <end>1570924800</end>
> </date_range>
> </report_metadata>
> <policy_published>
> <domain>affinityvision.com.au</domain>
> <adkim>s</adkim>
> <aspf>s</aspf>
> <p>quarantine</p>
> <sp>none</sp>
> </policy_published>
> <record>
> <row>
> <source_ip>82.195.75.100</source_ip>
> <count>1</count>
> <policy_evaluated>
> <disposition>none</disposition>
> <dkim>pass</dkim>
> <spf>fail</spf>
> </policy_evaluated>
> </row>
> <identifiers>
> <header_from>affinityvision.com.au</header_from>
> </identifiers>
> <auth_results>
> <dkim>
> <domain>affinityvision.com.au</domain>
> <selector>2018061201</selector>
> <result>pass</result>
> </dkim>
> <spf>
> <domain>lists.debian.org</domain>
> <result>permerror</result>
> <scope>mfrom</scope>
> </spf>
> </auth_results>
> </record>
> </feedback>
>
>
> Thanks and Kind Regards
> AndrewM
Sincerely,
--
^고맙습니다 _地平天成_ 감사합니다_^))//
Reply to: