Re: Authentication for telnet.
On Mon, 30 Sep 2019 at 15:55, Tixy <tixy@yxit.co.uk> wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-09-30 at 14:43 +1000, David wrote:
> > A final puzzle is that I vaguely recall from other
> > messages that you use something named Oberon.
> It came up in the discussion of why he breaks threads every time he
> posts to this list. The X-Mailer header in his emails says 'Oberon
> Mail' and it seems that MUA doesn't set In-Reply-To or References like
> it should do.
Ah yeah, thanks for the reminder. And furthermore ...
On Mon, 30 Sep 2019 at 08:15, <peter@easthope.ca> wrote:
> From: Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2019 19:23:45 +0300
> > I have to ask - what are you trying to achieve?
> An interactive shell session with minimal overhead. (Or maximal
> efficiency.) The telnet client in the Oberon subsystem is noticeably
> faster than competitors.
I now notice that the reason that "Oberon" was lurking somewhere in
my mind as a possible relevant factor is because Peter had in fact
mentioned it earlier in this discussion.
Reply to: