[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: gzip and old files Partly Solved



Might try "file rc.custom.gz" and make sure it says:

    rc.custom.gz: gzip compressed data, was "rc.custom", last modified: ...

to look at rc.custom.gz's magic(5) header.

    John

Martin McCormick writes:
> Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> writes:
> > Sounds unlikely.
> > 
> > > $ gzip -d rc.custom.gz
> > >
> > > gzip: rc.custom.gz: not in gzip format
> > 
> > Where did you get this file?
> 
> tomsrtbt-2.0.103
> 
>       Here's what happened:
> 
>       The rc.custom.gz file you posted is 961 bytes long.  My
> corrupt copy is also 961 bytes long and file describes it as
> data.
> 
> >  What does file(1) say about it?
> 
> $ file rc.custom.gz
> rc.custom.gz: data
> 
> >  How about
> > gzip --test?
> 
> $ gzip --test rc.custom.gz
> gzip: rc.custom.gz: not in gzip format
> 
> > I think it's more likely that your file is corrupt, than that gzip has
> > decided to become incompatible with itself.
> 
>       Fortunately, this turns out to be correct.
> 
>       The file you posted unzipped with gzip -d on my system
> with no issue at all.
> 
> The good file has a checksum of
> 10349     1
> 
> The bad version of the same file's checksum is
> 
> 13550     1.
> 
>       I mounted tomsrtbt.raw with 
>     mount -o loop tomsrtbt.raw  /mnt
> and that rc.custom.gz also has a checksum of
> 10349     1
> 
>       The install.s script has one to put a blank floppy in to
> the drive and does dd if=tomsrtbt.raw of=/dev/fd0 with a record
> count and somehow, that original diskette passed all the tests,
> seems to boot right up and let me start a serial console on it
> without so much as a single error.
> 
>       There is enough of this that is enough different from
> today's world that I thought things were much worse than they
> turned out to be.  I am amazed that the corrupted disk worked at
> all.
> 
>       Thanks for clearing up the confusion.
> 
> Martin McCormick

-- 

John Conover, conover@rahul.net, http://www.johncon.com/


Reply to: