On 7/08/19 5:31 AM, Dennis Wicks wrote: > rhkramer@gmail.com wrote on 8/6/19 10:34 AM: >> I didn't fully understand your fstab, but is there a typo -- wa11 vs. >> wa1? > No. My current config is; > > /wa1 -> wa11 ( soft link ) > /wa11 ( <- /dev/sdb2 ) > > with sdb2 mounted on /wa11 so I don't have to find and change all the > paths that I have starting with "/wa1/..."! So you're trying to mount on a symlink, instead of a directory? I don't think that's going to work. Why not mount on /wa11, as you describe? Or does /wa11 only exist because you can't mount on /wa1, and you were trying to mount on /wa1 when /wa1 was a directory? In which case - it would help to provide the requested files in the state where the problem exists :-) (also, one vs ell is confusing ... I assume you've got the right el^Wone :-) Cheers, Richard >> >> On Tuesday, August 06, 2019 11:09:32 AM Dennis Wicks wrote: >>> Requested info attached: >>> >>> I *cannot* mount *any* partition on /wa1 >>> but I *can* mount *any* partition on any other mount point. >>> >>> Regards, and Thanks! >>> Dennis >>> >>> Andrei POPESCU wrote on 8/6/19 1:06 AM: >>>> On Lu, 05 aug 19, 15:33:57, Dennis Wicks wrote: >>>>> It seems that something in the mount process does not like "wa1" for a >>>>> mount point. Anybody have similar recent problems? >>>> >>>> Please show your fstab and the output of 'lsblk -f'. >>>> >>>> Kind regards, >>>> Andrei >> >> >> >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature