Re: [SOLVED] tailf vs buster

To: Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net>
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [SOLVED] tailf vs buster
From: <tomas@tuxteam.de>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 09:55:03 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20190712075503.GC3284@tuxteam.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] E1hlbQ7-00062K-Hl@enotuniq.net>
References: <[🔎] E1hlbDI-00060Z-AG@enotuniq.net> <[🔎] 20190711154948.GS2450@eeg.ccf.org> <[🔎] E1hlbQ7-00062K-Hl@enotuniq.net>

On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 06:55:43PM +0300, Reco wrote:

[...]

> Figures. RedHat deserves whatever IBM will do to them.

You seem to be unaware of what RedHat has done for all of us.

Cheers
-- tomás

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [SOLVED] tailf vs buster
  - From: Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net>

References:
- tailf vs buster
  - From: Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net>
- Re: tailf vs buster
  - From: Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org>
- Re: [SOLVED] tailf vs buster
  - From: Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net>

Prev by Date: Re: chromebook
Next by Date: Re: chromebook
Previous by thread: Re: [SOLVED] tailf vs buster
Next by thread: Re: [SOLVED] tailf vs buster
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread