Re: List attachments (was: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender)
- To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: List attachments (was: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender)
- From: andreimpopescu@gmail.com
- Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2019 19:54:28 +0300
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20190622165428.uw3clf4qwldfqg4u@localhost>
- In-reply-to: <20190506102812.78af6762@abydos.stargate.org.uk>
- References: <20190505042828.C49FE47161@pb-sasl20.pobox.com> <B602C30E-1A37-4B51-97B0-95ECAA5B244D@pobox.com> <fff5ae44-9e76-a5bc-4220-d460066c358c@web.de> <20190505105528.7ea4255b@abydos.stargate.org.uk> <5AFB363A-A297-4E61-B18A-5AF98731657E@pobox.com> <20190505113109.29cca99b@abydos.stargate.org.uk> <CAMPXz=qrKAJnpscRo13QuAEE6tvjc=FKE=hFgNqxNm2B5v=BNw@mail.gmail.com> <20190506082155.3e063f56@abydos.stargate.org.uk> <CAMPXz=rEwAjUSvKaX4_Fr25Z0euD8ZbPrCHoy0wU2CF8oRKWaw@mail.gmail.com> <20190506102812.78af6762@abydos.stargate.org.uk>
On Lu, 06 mai 19, 10:28:12, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Mon, 6 May 2019 18:37:36 +1000
> David <bouncingcats@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >I think the proportion of people providing answers here who do care
> >would be significantly higher than the general population though.
> >That's why I was concerned enough to respond, and why I wrote
> >people *here* :)
>
> Fair point.
>
> I would contend though, that the number of people that do care is still
> less than 50%, even if not by much. I have no data to support that, it's
> just my gut feeling based on the number of gmail (and similar) email
> addresses that are in use here.
The lists are publicly archived, so the privacy benefits would be
minimal.
I also don't want to expose my other e-mail addresses, for privacy and
spam reasons ;)
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Reply to: