Re: text editors
- To: "deloptes@gmail.com" <deloptes@gmail.com>
- Cc: "debian-user@lists.debian.org" <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: text editors
- From: Gian Uberto Lauri <saint@eng.it>
- Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 07:52:19 +0000
- Message-id: <[🔎] 23713.49969.706846.515529@mail.eng.it>
- Reply-to: Gian Uberto Lauri <saint@eng.it>
- In-reply-to: <q7losl$405d$1@blaine.gmane.org>
- References: <20190327132642.GA21893@tuxteam.de> <87wokkmn88.fsf@dhh.gt.org> <20190327143736.GB21893@tuxteam.de> <q7hbmo$2lf8$2@blaine.gmane.org> <87ftr7n2mm.fsf@dhh.gt.org> <q7hqu9$352m$2@blaine.gmane.org> <20190328132910.md7sl3gomq2yisif@wren.corp> <8736n7m6fc.fsf@dhh.gt.org> <q7jahl$769q$2@blaine.gmane.org> <3b864075-2e5c-696c-130c-f141b284a73b@gmail.com> <20190329052641.GB3553@ratatosk> <23709.56222.755243.78773@mail.eng.it> <q7losl$405d$1@blaine.gmane.org>
>>>>> "d" == deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> writes:
d> Gian Uberto Lauri wrote:
EC> It's not. They are written in vimscript, analogous to elisp.
>>
>> Sorry not. While Elisp is a Lisp dialect, therefore is a language
>> that has been formally proved to be equivalent to turing-machine,
>> that is not certain for vimscript.
>>
>> And the elegance of the tool is more important that it seems at
>> first glance.
d> I've been listening at this BS at the university as well. Until now
d> I have not seen any practical or pragmatic use of this. I have
d> worked with PL and prolog for a while ... unfortunately I think in
d> coming years or decades it all will be declared dead ... when the
d> true AI from China will take over :D :D :D
I think that Lisp was used in AI because it was the best language you
could find to code smart algorithms on... Figure implementing mapcar
in assembler or FORTRAN :)
--
/\ ___ Ubuntu: ancient
/___/\_|_|\_|__|___Gian Uberto Lauri_____ African word
//--\| | \| | Integralista GNUslamico meaning "I can
\/ coltivatore diretto di software not install
già sistemista a tempo (altrui) perso... Debian"
Warning: gnome-config-daemon considered more dangerous than GOTO
Reply to: