Re: [OT] scanned files are large in size
Hi,
tomas wrote:
> > Yep. The one image is encoded as CCITT
> > It compresses much worse than the other which is JPEG,
Anders Andersson wrote:
> Not sure what you mean by "compresses much worse" here, but the CCITT
> version is much smaller than the JPEG version.
Because it uses 1 bit per channel/color whereas the other file uses
8 bpc. The fact that their size ratio is less than 1:8 demonstrates
the lossy compression power of the algorithm used in the 8 bpc image.
kamaraju kusumanchi, the OP, might see differences between both files if
using a viewer that can zoom-in far enough that scan pixels of 1/600 inch
become larger than the screen pixels.
Have a nice day :)
Thomas
Reply to: