[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Micro-report: using Stable without systemd



On 10/17/2018 07:32 AM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 05:28:04PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
The point is that no one from the systemd camp has, to my knowledge,
posted a list of things it can do better than sysvinit. Point out
sysvinit's warts, and what systemd does to excise the ugly stuff.

I'm not really in "the systemd camp", but I'm definitely in the group
of people who want to get away from sysv-rc because of its tremendous
flaws.

In addition to the responses you've already received, here's one in
the form of a Frequently Given Answer.  I consider it a good starting
point if you're already an experienced sysadmin.

http://jdebp.eu./FGA/system-5-rc-problems.html

That said, it might not be the best starting point for novices who are
wondering what all this stuff even *means*.


Speaking as a novice, it may not be the ideal starting point. But it is well written and without vitriol. A novice may not understand important details, but he should come away with an idea why developers tackled it.

I'll have to give it a detailed read when I have time to actively pursue nested links.
Thanks for the reference.





Reply to: