Re: best way to correct (possibly) outdated information on wiki.debian.org
Il 30/12/18 15:48, Roberto C. Sánchez ha scritto:
I would leave the bug report open. If it is a problem, the maintainer
may add the example back to the package. If it was removed by upstream
or there was some other intentional reason for the removal, he is likely
to comment on it and close the report.
There is an extremely minor difference between the old example and the
current service definition: the former had "fstrim -av" (all fs) and the
latter has "fstrim -Av" (fstab only). Might be relevant, might be not.
To do such and such, refer to such and such example. As of util-linux
version 184.108.40.206.5.6-7 this example is no longer provided. An
alternate approach is blah blah blah. Or refer to an older version of
the package for the referenced example.
Anyhow, you get the idea.
Unfortunately, I have no clue precisely when the change happened since
the system was upgraded from stable to testing to support the new Ryzen CPU.
Anyhow, I do get the idea: once I'm registered logged in, I'll try to be
as specific as possible.