Re: dual port cross over cable bonding
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 10:46:15AM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 03:45:14PM +0100, Adam Weremczuk wrote:
> > Yes, 192.168.200.1 and 192.168.200.2 netmask 30
> > All ports and cables work when tested 1-1 but not with my 2-2 bonding
> > config.
> >
> > > Looks like your LACP is correct but your IP addressing is wrong.
> > >
> > > Do you have parentheses in it, or are you trying to suggest that
> > > one is .1 and the other is .2?
>
> Also, balance-rr is in conflict with layer3+4.
>
And I think slaves should be spelled "bond-slaves".
-dsr-
Reply to: