Re: df -h shows insufficient precision
On 26.08.18 12:25, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> A regular itchy annoyance for years now:
> df shows bytes, df -h shows only one decimal place, so e.g. on a
> 1.8TiB drive "1.6T" is the free space, but that resolution/ precision
> is insufficient.
For more than 3 decades I've just used "df -k". OK, even on smaller
disks than yours, that's a lot of digits, so a bit of mental juggling:
$ df -k
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda9 293477416 15376432 263193184 6% /home
Better is "df -m". On larger disks, you'll have more digits than here:
$ df -m
Filesystem 1M-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda9 286600 15017 257025 6% /home
> Of course I can fire up bc, set scale=20 and do some
> powers of 1024 division, but that's all very clunky.
> How hard would it be to add an option to bc, to choose the number of
> decimal places to use in the output, or the number of digits of
> precision to display?
Harder than putting the output of df -k through two lines of awk in a
shell function, I figure.