[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Replace systemd



Le 07/06/17 à 13:48, Reco a écrit :
> 	Hi.
> 
> On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 12:53:29PM +0200, Erwan David wrote:
>> Le 07/03/17 à 22:48, Dejan Jocic a écrit :
>>>
>>> You can still use Debian without systemd as init. Explained here:
>>>
>>> https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2017/05/msg00538.html
>>>
>>> If you would prefer that it is some derivate/fork of Debian without
>>> systemd, I do not have personal experience with those, but I'm sure that
>>> you will get few hints.
>>>
>> init is a small part of systemd. And judging y the bug reported and how
>> they are treated, I do not trust any part of it.
>> Neither resolved, logind, etc...
> 
> So you do not trust udev as well?
> 
> 
>> Too many critical bugs found in them and treated by the upstream
>> developpers with only contempt for the people reporting them
>> (see https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/6237#issuecomment-312458445)
> 
> By that logic (in)famous libc bug 4980 shoud've stopped by from using
> any sane Linux distribution 10 years ago. Did it?
>
Most important is not the presence of bugs. It is the way people in
charge deal with them.

> 
>> This behaviour on a critical component is mere madness.
> 
> OpenBSD folks beg to differ.
> 
> https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=149902196520920&w=2

They were mocking systemd, not adopting the behaviour...




Reply to: