Re: Reply-to-all or reply-to-list again
UTC Time: June 10, 2017 2:13 AM
From: joel.rees@gmail.com
On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 12:57 AM, Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> wrote:
> Le primidi 21 prairial, an CCXXV, The Wanderer a écrit :
>> Disagreed. This results in sending extra copies to people who are
>> subscribed to the list, which is incorrect.
>
> Not if the list is properly configured.
>
> Debian's lists are badly configured, it results in burden to all users,
> but the users should reject that burden. I do.
>
> I will not answer Gene's message, he obviously missed the whole point of
> my mail.
> Nicolas George
And Now Google Doesn't Think Users Should Ever Set Headers.
Progress is progress.
Progress in a society comes when they collectively pursue in common something
that would improve their lives and conditions. If the few and powerful coerce or
blackmail a society to move a certain direction because that advances the interests
of the few I wouldn't dare call this progress. Rarely in history did such moves lasted
and stabilized, as for every action there is a reaction. Just give it some time and
the vast majority of the world will be really happy to see google/fb/ms collapse
and vanish. That may be progress, being without the pests.
Would you call android and win10 progress? I hope not. Vehicles were progress
over horses and carriages in some respects, people walking and one in
ten thousands being driven in a Rolls Royce where the passengers were covered
and the driver was outside was not progress. Model A was progress at
a cost.
Progress is not made by following rulers and those in power, it comes
from the dialectic of resisting and reacting to power and oligarchy.
Joel Rees
(AK)
Reply to: