Re: Valid DKIM signature
Byung-Hee HWANG (황병희, 黃炳熙) wrote:
> Dear deloptes,
>
> deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> 께서 쓰시길,
> 《記事 全文 <[🔎] ompu70$3e9$1@blaine.gmane.org> 에서》:
>
>> It should have been more proper to start a new thread.
>>
>> X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=5.21 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3
>> tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
>> FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA=2.309, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25,
>> FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLYTO_END_DIGIT=0.25,
>> HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001,
>> RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
>>
>> This is the reason why it passed. It was scored 5.21 while 5.3 was
>> required to flag it
>
> It sould be increase more HTML_MESSAGE score, i think.
>
or more properly configured
X-policyd-weight: NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 NOT_IN_BL_NJABL=-1.5
CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .yahoo. -
helo: .sonic323-31.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo. - helo-domain: .yahoo.)
FROM/MX_MATCHES_HELO(DOMAIN)=-2; rate: -7
and last but not least, add some component that can be trained at regular
bases
regards
Reply to: