[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Hibernate in stretch



On Saturday, 29 July 2017 18:40:58 CEST solitone wrote:
> From what I gather, the patch was included in kernel version 4.8-rc2:
> 
> $ git describe bafb2f7d4755bf1571bd5e9a03b97f3fc4fe69ae
> v4.8-rc2-641-gbafb2f7d4755
> 
> The kernel shipped with Stretch is version 4.9.30:
> 
> $ uname -v
> #1 SMP Debian 4.9.30-2+deb9u2 (2017-06-26)
> 
> but we still experience the bug. This is because, if I understand it right,
> the commit containing this patch was reverted in the production kernel:
> 
> commit 0ee72d8f9b8e17b8e4ccfebc7a25cbc2d395cd6a
> Author: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Date:   Wed Apr 12 15:49:39 2017 +0200
> 
>     Revert "drm/i915/execlists: Reset RING registers upon resume"
> 
>     This reverts commit f2a0409a08502d64fbe3990354dff5902b08d2fb which is
>     commit bafb2f7d4755bf1571bd5e9a03b97f3fc4fe69ae upstream.
> 
>     It was reported to have problems.
> 
> I therefore wonder whether this means this bug is still there in the
> production kernel, even in versions greater than 4.9.x.

Yes, that patch ended up in v4.9.9 [1]. Then some problems were reported, and 
it was reverted in v4.9.23 with commit 
0ee72d8f9b8e17b8e4ccfebc7a25cbc2d395cd6a [2].

I have just installed kernel version 4.11.6, from stretch-backports:

~$ uname -a
Linux alan 4.11.0-0.bpo.1-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.11.6-1~bpo9+1 (2017-07-09) 
x86_64 GNU/Linux

With that kernel hibernate seems to work, but I need further testing. I would 
suggest you to test that kernel version as well, and post your findings here.

[1] https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/ChangeLog-4.9.9	
[2] https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/ChangeLog-4.9.23



-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ 
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁    Sent from my brain using neurons fueled by glucose.
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ 
⠈⠳⣄


Reply to: