Re: kernel performance: 3.16 vs. 4.9

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: kernel performance: 3.16 vs. 4.9
From: "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net>
Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2017 11:22:26 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 15736741595102297212@scdbackup.webframe.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87shntuetr.fsf@iki.fi>
References: <[🔎] 87shntuetr.fsf@iki.fi>

Hi,

>     $ git diff v3.16..v4.9 | wc
>    13563424 53139667 428195099

Would still fit on an audio CD. Just 40 minutes to listen. :o)


Have a nice day :)

Thomas

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: kernel performance: 3.16 vs. 4.9
  - From: Darac Marjal <mailinglist@darac.org.uk>

References:
- Re: kernel performance: 3.16 vs. 4.9
  - From: Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi>

Prev by Date: Re: kernel performance: 3.16 vs. 4.9
Next by Date: Problem: suspend-to-disk + encrypted filesystems
Previous by thread: Re: kernel performance: 3.16 vs. 4.9
Next by thread: Re: kernel performance: 3.16 vs. 4.9
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread