Re: [Artwork] Survey for the default artwork for Stretch

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [Artwork] Survey for the default artwork for Stretch
From: Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net>
Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2016 10:14:48 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 57F90D68.40407@cloud85.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 201610081333.21327.lisi.reisz@gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] 20161007222354.GK22496@copernicus.org.uk> <[🔎] 201610081333.21327.lisi.reisz@gmail.com>

On 10/8/2016 7:33 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote:

On Friday 07 October 2016 23:23:54 Brian wrote:

Seen as important enough to send to debian-devel. Some might be
interested in voting.

   https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2016/10/msg00042.html


Thanks, Brian.  Since I do actually care, I have voted.  One or two of them
are so awful I might even consider leaving Debian if they were chosen. ;-)

Lisi

I'd rate them from silly to ugly, but none would cause me toabandon Debian

*IF* I can continue to set my display to a single solid color ofmy choice without shading/gradient.

I didn't see anything following a chain of links that wouldindicate I'd lose that option on Stretch. Is that a good assumption?

Reply to:

References:
- [Artwork] Survey for the default artwork for Stretch
  - From: Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk>
- Re: [Artwork] Survey for the default artwork for Stretch
  - From: Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Synaptic NMU upload in testing
Next by Date: Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.
Previous by thread: Re: [Artwork] Survey for the default artwork for Stretch
Next by thread: Re: [Artwork] Survey for the default artwork for Stretch
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread