Le primidi 11 nivôse, an CCXXV, Gene Heskett a écrit : > From personal experience decades ago, on a dos3.2 system, this is > correct. But I can't testify about the newer, or the now several non-M$ > versions of dos. I saw an announcement of yet another dos release just a > couple weeks back. I assume its getting better Think a little more about it: it is a limitation of the format, not the operating system. If an operating system extends the format, it is no longer compatible with the rest of the world, and then there is no reason to use FAT at all. Regards, -- Nicolas George
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature