Re: networking

[Michael Milliman <michael.e.milliman@gmail.com>]

On 08/26/2016 06:19 AM, Nicolas George wrote:
> Le decadi 10 fructidor, an CCXXIV, Pol Hallen a écrit :
> > I suggests him to separate each networks:
> >
> > floor1 - 192.168.1.0/24
> > floor2 - 192.168.2.0/24
> > floor3 - 192.168.3.0/24
> > floor4 - 192.168.4.0/24
> Why?
>
> You give way too few information about the needs of your friend to allow
> anyone to give relevant advice. If someone did, it was just by exercising
> supernatural divination powers.
>
> (Also, I wonder why people always fiddle with the cumbersome 192.168 instead
> of going for simply 10.)
And the difference?? Both are designated for private use.  192.168 
simply has less address space.  10. can certainly be used, as can 
192.168, either in a number of configurations.  Neither is really more 
cumbersome than others.  Its all in how you define your network space.
> Regards,

--
73's
Mike, WB5VQX