[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [computers] bad sectors on disk



On 02/10/2016 07:35 PM, TWS Admin wrote:
> Please remove julius.roberts@wildernes.org.au
> <mailto:julius.roberts@wildernes.org.au> from this list, he's no longer
> working with us.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> the Wilderness society
> 
> On 9 February 2016 at 19:57, Ritesh Raj Sarraf <rrs@researchut.com
> <mailto:rrs@researchut.com>> wrote:
> 
>     Hello,
> 
>     On my RPi2, I saw the following reported by my kernel.
> 
>     [156278.815976] sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] UNKNOWN(0x2003) Result:
>     hostbyte=0x00 driverbyte=0x00
>     [156278.823864] sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] CDB: opcode=0x28 28 00 9a 40 04 47
>     00 00 08 00
>     [156278.831152] blk_update_request: I/O error, dev sdb, sector
>     2587886663
> 
> 
>     This got me worried so I ran an fsck on my drive. Following is the
>     report.
> 
>     130 pi@pi:~$ sudo fsck -cvkv /dev/sdb1 
>     [sudo] password for pi: 
>     fsck from util-linux 2.25.2
>     e2fsck 1.42.12 (29-Aug-2014)
>     Checking for bad blocks (read-only test): done                      
>                               
>     SEAGATE: Updating bad block inode.
>     Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
>     Pass 2: Checking directory structure
>     Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
>     Pass 4: Checking reference counts
>     Pass 5: Checking group summary information
> 
>     SEAGATE: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****
> 
>            20013 inodes used (0.02%, out of 122101760)
>             8944 non-contiguous files (44.7%)
>               53 non-contiguous directories (0.3%)
>                  # of inodes with ind/dind/tind blocks: 0/0/0
>                  Extent depth histogram: 16695/3216/62
>        416471936 blocks used (85.28%, out of 488378008)
>                0 bad blocks
>               63 large files
> 
>            17086 regular files
>             2885 directories
>                0 character device files
>                0 block device files
>                0 fifos
>                0 links
>               33 symbolic links (32 fast symbolic links)
>                0 sockets
>     ------------
>            20004 files
>     1 pi@pi:~$ 
> 
> 
>     From the report, it says that there are 0 bad blocks. So is this a
>     bug in e2fsprogs ?
> 
> 
>     -- 
>     Ritesh Raj Sarraf
>     RESEARCHUT -- http://www.researchut.com
>     "Necessity is the mother of invention"
> 
> 
fsck checks primarily a directory structure not the hard drives. you
might want to try

badblocks -svn /dev/sdb

Like always, backup your drive before you do this.

-- 
Joseph Loo
jloo@acm.org


Reply to: