[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Moving LVM volume?



Joel Rees wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > the disk as physical volumes for lvm.  For you I might suggest:
> >
> >   /dev/sdb1         /boot   {256M}
> >   /dev/sdb4  extended       {remainder}
> 
> Why extended? I generally put my LVM partition straight in a DOS
> primary partition, unless I needed more than three non-LVM partitions
> for some reason.

The original poster already had it as an extended partition.  I was
simply editing their original listing to fit.  Here is the original
poster's listing.

>>>    /dev/sdb1         /   (root) {7G}
>>>    /dev/sdb2         /swap       {4GB}
>>>    /dev/sdb3         /oldjunk    {1G}
>>>    /dev/sdb4  extended      {remainder}
>>>    /dev/sdb5     LVM        {one large volume}

Therefore when I cut down that listing I simply left that part as it
was since I didn't think it mattered.  They were using an unusual
format for describing the partitions and I didn't want to be too
disruptive of it thinking that it must be the way they liked it.  And
since that detail wasn't significant I didn't change it.

Personally I tend to have more than four partitions.  Therefore I will
almost always end up using extended partitions.  And so I have gotten
into the habit of always using them.  No other reason.

I do try to keep /boot as simple as possible and therefore do actively
try to always have /boot on /dev/sda1 as a simple ext2 file system
without lvm.  I understand more complicated configurations work now
but they haven't always and keeping it simple for /boot has always
made things easier for me when there has been system trouble and
debugging needed.

Bob

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: