Re: Mailing lists, CC, followup-to, netiquette and all the rest [was: direct ethernet connection between computer and printer]
On Monday 19 October 2015 07:47:53 tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 04:47:02PM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 09:21:49PM +0200, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > > > tomas said:
> > > > Yes, you are right about the CoC part. Still, if someone is picky
> > > > about *not* being cc'ed, I'd consider it polite to at least do
> > > > his/her part and express this wish with the headers in use for this
> > > > purpose. At least *before* scolding others <:*)
>
> [...]
>
> > So you're saying that someone who is following the code should go out
> > of their way to accomodate the ones who won't follow the code?
>
> *sigh*
>
> I give up. Do whatever you want.
Of course Chris will do what he wants, and not what you want. Why should he
do anything else?
But you are *still* not following the code. You have addressed that to Chris
with a cc to the list. You seem to think that you should dictate how the
list behaves and that the CoC is an aberration that OUGHT to be ignored.
As I said to you, "you are sending them (these double copies)
deliberately, and being a nuisance deliberately. Another word for that is
trolling."
Lisi
Reply to:
- Prev by Date:
Re: Mailing lists, CC, followup-to, netiquette and all the rest [was: direct ethernet connection between computer and printer]
- Next by Date:
Re: Mailing lists, CC, followup-to, netiquette and all the rest [was: direct ethernet connection between computer and printer]
- Previous by thread:
Re: Mailing lists, CC, followup-to, netiquette and all the rest [was: direct ethernet connection between computer and printer]
- Next by thread:
Re: Mailing lists, CC, followup-to, netiquette and all the rest [was: direct ethernet connection between computer and printer]
- Index(es):