[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: whatsapp on Debian?



On Sunday 18 October 2015 13:55:06 foster2cbrandon@gmail.com wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> If you check out WhatsApp's website, or the wikipedia page:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WhatsApp The only supported operating systems
> are on phones. Since it's a mobile phone app, I would guess there is no PC
> port of this.
> > On Oct 18, 2015, at 12:36, Rodolfo Medina <rodolfo.medina@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > 
> > Andrew McGlashan <andrew.mcglashan@affinityvision.com.au> writes:
> >> Hi,
> >> 
> >>> On 17/10/2015 9:52 PM, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> >>> I've found several how-to's about installing whatsapp on Linux and
> >>> Debian but none of them was useful to me.  Anyone out there who was
> >>> successful with the issue and can report how to do?
> >> 
> >> I'm not sure what you need, but the secure messaging part (when it is
> >> done right) is being handled with code from the TextSecure project.
> >> If that is what you are after, then you might want to consider looking
> >> at that project -- Android TextSecure / Red Phone .... iOS Signal is
> >> the equivalent, but in one app.  The Android apps are expected to
> >> become one app too, but not sure when.
> >> 
> >> https://whispersystems.org/
> >> 
> >> The apps on github:
> >> https://github.com/whispersystems/
> > 
> > Thanks.  But, as far as I understand, that's not for PCs, only for
> > phones... What I want is instead to use whatsapp from my PC.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Rodolfo

Open https://web.whatsapp.com/
Take a picture of the QR-code from out of WhatsApp on your phone and voilá 
WhatsApp in a (any) browser. But you still need the phone to do that. Don't 
know if that suits your need.
Cheers
Eike

-- 
Eike Lantzsch ZP6CGE

It's is not, it isn't ain't, and it's it's, not its, if you mean it
is. If you don't, it's its. Then too, it's hers. It isn't her's. It
isn't our's either. It's ours, and likewise yours and theirs.
 -- Oxford University Press, Edpress New


Reply to: