[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: No system d after update wheezy -> jessie?



On 28/09/2015 10:11, Brian wrote:
On Sun 27 Sep 2015 at 22:56:38 +0100, Joe wrote:

On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 21:00:09 +0200
Markus Grunwald <markus@the-grue.de> wrote:

Hello,

after the update from wheezy to jessie, there is no systemd running
on my machine. I had the impression, that systemd is installed
automatically...?

% dpkg -l \*systemd\* | egrep \^ii
ii  libsystemd0:amd64        215-17+deb8u2 amd64        systemd
utility library

% ps ax | grep system
  3441 ?        Ss     0:00 /usr/bin/dbus-daemon --system
16669 pts/1    S+     0:00 grep --color=auto system

% ps ax | head -n 2
   PID TTY      STAT   TIME COMMAND
     1 ?        Ss     0:02 init [2]

  % dpkg -S /sbin/init
sysvinit-core: /sbin/init

I have to add that  the machine is a vserver where I have influence
on the kernel

% cat /proc/cmdline
root=/dev/xvda1
ip=95.129.55.223:127.0.255.255:95.129.55.193:255.255.255.192:vsrv28769.customer.xenway.de:eth0:off


I believe there was a deliberate decision not to include systemd in an
upgrade, only in new installations.

Actually, the decision was the opposite of this. A dist-upgrade will
install systemd-sysv unless steps are taken to prevent it happening.

   https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/release-notes/ch-whats-new.en.html#systemd

   https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/release-notes/ch-information.en.html#systemd-upgrade-default-init-system

Thanks, I haven't yet upgraded a wheezy to jessie.

I had been under the impression, from previous systemd discussions, that an upgrade of stable would not by default switch to a systemd init. Clearly this is not the case, and it will.

I'm not at all keen on doing that, I still favour a clean systemd-based installation for my server, with the associated configuration work. An upgraded stable will never be quite identical with a clean installation with the same requested packages, and I'm not planning on asking for more trouble than is absolutely necessary.

--
Joe


Reply to: