[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: iceweasel download panel uses gimp for pdf



On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 07:36:43 +0200
<tomas@tuxteam.de> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 07:28:29PM -0700, Jimmy Johnson wrote:
> > On 09/18/2015 07:11 PM, Ross Boylan wrote:
> > >When I download a pdf in iceweasel and click on the download icon
> > >to open the list of downloaded files, and click  on a pdf file,
> > >gimp starts.
> > >
> > >I want okular to be used instead.  How can I do that from the
> > >download panel?  (I know I can open the file independently).
> > >
> > >Also, when I open the containing folder (from the same download
> > >panel) gwenview starts.  I want a regular file browser.
> > >
> > >I can't figure out where this is set.  The pdf application
> > >association in iceweasel has "always download"; I think these are
> > >settings for embedded content on web pages, and don't control file
> > >associations from the download pane.
> > >
> > >I'm running under KDE; it lists okular as the  top file
> > >association for pdf, though gimp is an alternate.
> > 
> > Hi!
> > 
> > Right click on a .pdf file, choose open with, other, drop down box
> > choose Okular. Done.
> 
> Explanation: there is a system global "database" which associates the
> MIME type of a file with the preferred application(s) to open it (with
> many kludges inherited from Windows, alas).
> 

Indeed, but Iceweasel (and possibly other browsers) has its own
independent database, which allows an application to be selected, or
the user asked at download time. Open Preferences, then Application.

> For some strange reason The Gimp has been associated to
> "application/pdf". Now every user has to correct that to some
> sensible PDF viewer.
> 

Not in my sid, which has Evince, now known as 'Document Viewer' set for
pdfs. I must find another PostScript viewer, as Evince is also set for
that, and it's rubbish at displaying the few PS files it can open
without crashing...

-- 
Joe


Reply to: