Re: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender

To: Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk>
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
From: Jayson Willson <jaysonwillson245@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2015 07:27:08 +0300
Message-id: <[🔎] CACjB-OU8xOdZi8SUm_8Zu1giypDhhzwOZZsdjOQGUJuCxPbgQg@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20150627202033.GN4120@copernicus.demon.co.uk>
References: <20150627175434.1B00E560070@mdfmta006.tch.inty.net> <[🔎] CACjB-OV0=scL2zY7cSq7tw+x1tomx+tCaOo7v50pbKHmWxwhsg@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20150627202033.GN4120@copernicus.demon.co.uk>

No, I have understood everything, what was being discussed in this thread. My comment about sensible-* command itself was just a comment, which meant "these programs are however not to convenient to use". Sorry.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
  - From: Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com>

References:
- Re: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
  - From: Jayson Willson <jaysonwillson245@gmail.com>
- Re: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
  - From: Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: network-manager in Jessie upgrade issues
Next by Date: Re: CUPS is just killing me
Previous by thread: Re: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
Next by thread: Re: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread