[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Debian/MIPS Jessie doesn't resolve hostnames? [RESOLVED]



On 31/05/15 09:40, deloptes wrote:
> Stuart Longland wrote:
>> I'm tempted to try a newer kernel on the thing to see if that helps,
>> since the stock Debian/MIPS Cobalt kernels are still at the 3.2 series.
> 
> What has the kernel to do with this precisely?

Rather, it's what it's *not* doing.  The UDP packet doesn't seem to be
getting to the C library.  To answer Pascal's question: dig/host do the
same thing, they time out.

>> By the sounds of things, it's something MIPS specific, so I might move
>> this over to the Debian/MIPS mailing list next.
> 
> You get timeout on the nameservers you have in your resolv.conf file
> 10.1.1.1 and 10.87.130.254. Where are those values coming from?
> Or perhaps could be some ipv4/6 issue.

The settings come via DHCP.  They work for every other device in the
building.

> To me it looks ok what its doing, you have to find out why you time out on
> your DNS servers.

Okay, it's something funny with the linux-image-r5k-cobalt package,
which is the version in Wheezy since they haven't updated it for Jessie.

When I cross-compiled my own kernel (version 4.0.4), I get this:
> root@qube:~# ping -c 1 www.google.com.au
> PING www.google.com.au (216.58.220.99) 56(84) bytes of data.
> 64 bytes from syd10s01-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.220.99): icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=15.9 ms
> 
> --- www.google.com.au ping statistics ---
> 1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 4ms
> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 15.938/15.938/15.938/0.000 ms
> root@qube:~# [   94.864000] tun: Universal TUN/TAP device driver, 1.6
> [   94.868000] tun: (C) 1999-2004 Max Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com>
> uname -a
> Linux qube 4.0.4 #2 Mon Jun 1 10:26:07 EST 2015 mips64 GNU/Linux

So all is well now.  If the Debian/MIPS project update
linux-image-r5k-cobalt then things should work fine.

Regards,
-- 
Stuart Longland (aka Redhatter, VK4MSL)

I haven't lost my mind...
  ...it's backed up on a tape somewhere.


Reply to: