Re: apt-get upgrade: packages have been kept back
Hi Patrick
dist-upgrade did it. Now as a general rule is it safe to use a dist-upgrade in a production environment? I suppose there is a good reason for having upgrade and dist-upgrade.
Regards
ML
On Tuesday, April 21, 2015 11:39 AM, Patrick Weiden <patrick@dieweidens.de> wrote:
Hi,
have you tried an "apt-get dist-upgrade"?
Some packages won't be upgraded by the "apt-get upgrade" operation. Please try the first and tell us the results. Thanks!
Cheers,
Patrick
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:26 AM, ML mail <mlnospam@yahoo.com> wrote:
Hi,
>
>I was wondering why an "apt-get upgrade"on my Debian wheezy box does not want to update the OpenJDK packages as you can see below:
>
>
>shell$ apt-get upgrade
>
>
>Reading package lists... Done
>Building dependency tree
>Reading state information... Done
>The following packages have been kept back:
>icedtea-6-jre-cacao icedtea-6-jre-jamvm openjdk-6-jre openjdk-6-jre-headless openjdk-6-jre-lib
>0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 5 not upgraded.
>
>Anyone has an idea why they are all kept back? Is something broken on my side maybe?
>
>Regards
>ML
>
>
>--
>To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
>with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>Archive: [🔎] 947300723.1245321.1429608381379.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com">https://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 947300723.1245321.1429608381379.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com
>
>
Reply to: