[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Is this an April Fool joke running early ? (Systemd to fork the kernel)



On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:07:57AM -0400, bjf092@gmail.com wrote:
> Reading Wikipedia- it says systemd was chosen as default on Jessie after discussion over these mailing lists...
> 
> Is this wrong?

No. You can see some of the discussion here:
https://bugs.debian.org/727708. You can probably find more deliberation
on the Debian Committee mailing list at
https://lists.debian.org/debian-ctte/

> 
> 
> > On Mar 31, 2015, at 04:25, Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> On Tuesday 31 March 2015 08:21:12 Peter Viskup wrote:
> >> "Instead we will soon have GNU/systemd, [a] much simpler, unified platform.
> >> GNU/systemd will be a better target for third-party developers and easier
> >> to support."
> >> What? Foolish guys... Reading behind the words - no cooperation, discussion
> >> and respect, we will take over! Completely wrong...
> >> 
> >> Would like to read official answer and plans from Debian project. With some
> >> clarification of possible impact on security and Debian itself (who will
> >> audit "their" kernel?).
> > 
> > You're not going to get it.  The whole thing was an April Fool joke released 
> > early.  It will live in memory like the spaghetti trees.
> > 
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spaghetti-tree_hoax
> > 
> > Lisi
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
> > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> > Archive: [🔎] 201503310925.06451.lisi.reisz@gmail.com">https://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 201503310925.06451.lisi.reisz@gmail.com
> > 
> 
> 
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> Archive: [🔎] 0A44AD7D-4CE5-4C5E-BA4D-EF96941C333C@gmail.com">https://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 0A44AD7D-4CE5-4C5E-BA4D-EF96941C333C@gmail.com
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: