AW: Redirect HTTPS with Squid3+Squidguard
I agree 100% with Reco.
Don't use technical Stuff to protect your children.
Learn them to use their Brain, to protect their self.
It's the most important thing, when u sit in front of a Computer.
When u want to block adult content u have to block 80% of the entire visible web.
And you will spend your evenings to make your blacklists up2date.
Greetings
Sascha
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Reco [mailto:recoverym4n@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 26. März 2015 13:52
An: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Betreff: Re: Redirect HTTPS with Squid3+Squidguard
Hi.
On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 13:21:57 +0100
Peter Viskup <skupko.sk@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> just jumped into SSLBump/Split features some months ago. I don't find
> these features harmful. Especially when protecting your children from
> access of YouTube or other possibly harmful sites. Once you are logged
> with Google account they redirect your communication to https which
> makes the inspection not possible. The Squid's SSLBump/Split (whose
> name in latest version SslPeekAndSplice) is the only feature which
> will make the inspection happen. This means there are still some cases
> where this feature is very helpful and the only one freely available.
If you're considering that spying on your own children is a good idea - I don't even know what to say. They solve such problems here by educating children, not limiting their internet access. Besides, if a child would really want to bypass such access control - he or she will find a way sooner or later (hint - a cellphone, for instance).
The only good usage of SSL Bump in my book is reverse-engineering certain proprietary applications.
Recp
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: [🔎] 20150326155150.246957029666332067526e0a@gmail.com">https://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 20150326155150.246957029666332067526e0a@gmail.com
Reply to: