[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Not sure which package to report problem under



I think that the problem I have is in the Kernel - but it affects CUPS 1.7.5 - running on Debian GNU/Linux 8 (jessie) 64-bit with all updates installed. If my memory serves me correctly I did some testing around 3 months ago on the same system and had no problem with the same printer - but this may be a red herring although I think the kernel was updated in the meantime.

Basically Point Of Sale printer delays before printing. Sometime 29 seconds, has been several minutes. The CUPS drivers have been reloaded several times and the PPD file re-installed. (Epson TM-U220 on USB)
Network printers appear to work OK

Today kern.log shows:-
Jan 31 10:21:21 MOSQ-POS kernel: [  910.794419] usblp0: removed
Jan 31 10:21:38 MOSQ-POS kernel: [ 927.318209] usblp 1-1:1.0: usblp0: USB Bidirectional printer dev 2 if 0 alt 0 proto 2 vid 0x04B8 pid 0x0202

Jan 31 10:56:20 MOSQ-POS kernel: [ 3010.446535] usblp0: removed
Jan 31 10:56:41 MOSQ-POS kernel: [ 3031.665222] usblp 1-1:1.0: usblp0: USB Bidirectional printer dev 2 if 0 alt 0 proto 2 vid 0x04B8 pid 0x0202

Jan 31 11:06:46 MOSQ-POS kernel: [ 3636.521992] usblp0: removed
Jan 31 11:07:09 MOSQ-POS kernel: [ 3659.035275] usblp 1-1:1.0: usblp0: USB Bidirectional printer dev 2 if 0 alt 0 proto 2 vid 0x04B8 pid 0x0202

Jan 31 12:24:28 MOSQ-POS kernel: [ 8299.879895] usblp0: removed
Jan 31 12:25:05 MOSQ-POS kernel: [ 8336.693772] usblp 1-1:1.0: usblp0: USB Bidirectional printer dev 2 if 0 alt 0 proto 2 vid 0x04B8 pid 0x0202

Jan 31 12:49:10 MOSQ-POS kernel: [ 9781.723667] usblp0: removed
Jan 31 12:49:49 MOSQ-POS kernel: [ 9820.691729] usblp 1-1:1.0: usblp0: USB Bidirectional printer dev 2 if 0 alt 0 proto 2 vid 0x04B8 pid 0x0202

The usblp0 is removed when the print is initiated and printout only starts again when the printer is found again (I guess that's what it means)

It appears that many people have reported this issue - or very very similar - with several distributions.

Many thanks

Jim Cobley


Reply to: