2014/12/12 21:08 <berenger.morel@neutralite.org>:
>
>
>
> Le 12.12.2014 13:05, Andrei POPESCU a écrit :
>
>> On Jo, 11 dec 14, 17:33:51, berenger.morel@neutralite.org wrote:
>>>
>>> Plus, it's not portable
>>> (anyone have seen dbus on windows? not sure, but I doubt it's on *BSD, too)
>>> unlike sockets.
>>
>>
>> From http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/dbus/
>>
>> D-Bus is very portable to any Linux or UNIX flavor, and a port to
>> Windows is in progress.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Andrei
>
>
> Nice to learn about that, and sorry for wrong assumption.
> Does someone use it on a non-linux based computer? Any experience about that would be appreciated.
>
FWIW, openbsd has an implementation of a "dbus" daemon just for the dbus dependent apps to talk to.
It's not the dbus that you download from freedesktop.org, of course.
--
Joel Rees
Computer memory is just fancy paper,
CPUs just fancy pens.
All is a stream of text
flowing from the past into the future.