Re: LVM RAID5 with missing disk?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: LVM RAID5 with missing disk?
From: Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 13:20:27 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 5486E90B.3020408@plouf.fr.eu.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20141208125142383185499.NoCcsPlease@bob.proulx.com>
References: <[🔎] 54805E17.7040107@sharktooth.de> <[🔎] 20141204175144.GF30237@randomstring.org> <[🔎] 54813CCE.30309@torfree.net> <[🔎] 86y4qm76vi.fsf@gaheris.avalon.lan> <[🔎] 5481D279.7000101@torfree.net> <[🔎] 20141208125142383185499.NoCcsPlease@bob.proulx.com>

Bob Proulx a écrit :
> 
> I favor RAID6's extra redundancy for more safety but I
> still use RAID1 too.

RAID 1 can provide as much or more redundancy than RAID 6.
RAID 1 on 3 disks provides as much redundancy as RAID 6.
RAID 1 on 4 disks provides more redundancy than RAID 6 (but half the
usable space).

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: LVM RAID5 with missing disk?
  - From: Bob Proulx <bob@proulx.com>

References:
- LVM RAID5 with missing disk?
  - From: mad <mad@sharktooth.de>
- Re: LVM RAID5 with missing disk?
  - From: Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org>
- Re: LVM RAID5 with missing disk?
  - From: Gary Dale <extremegroundmailer@gmail.com>
- Re: LVM RAID5 with missing disk?
  - From: Mart van de Wege <mvdwege@gmail.com>
- Re: LVM RAID5 with missing disk?
  - From: Gary Dale <extremegroundmailer@gmail.com>
- Re: LVM RAID5 with missing disk?
  - From: Bob Proulx <bob@proulx.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Skipping fsck during boot with systemd?
Next by Date: jessie: dpkg-bug #768599
Previous by thread: Re: LVM RAID5 with missing disk?
Next by thread: Re: LVM RAID5 with missing disk?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread