Re: Challenge to you: Voice your concerns regarding systemd upstream
Hi.
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 03:21:47AM -0700, Rusi Mody wrote:
> On Monday, September 29, 2014 3:40:01 PM UTC+5:30, Reco wrote:
> > Hi.
>
> > On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 04:31:01PM +0200, lee wrote:
> > > Debian already lost me (after over 15 years) when they came up with
> > > their brokenarch and left users stranded with no possible fix for the
> > > things they broke. The only reason I'm here is because I have it
> > > running on my server, and the only reason I have it on my server is
> > > because it was the only distribution of those I tried with which I could
> > > get xen to work. I really didn't want to use Debian.
>
> > What's wrong with the current multiarch implementation in your option?
> > I'm really curious as all multiarch complains I've seen so far (barring
> > actual package limits) were easily solved just by reading an appropriate
> > man page (or Debian wiki page).
>
>
> A recent question of mine:
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2014/08/msg01394.html
A fine example of dependency bug, if you ask my option. I'd report a bug
against a package which caused such abnormal dependency (i.e. same
package with two different arches).
Reco
Reply to: