[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Effectively criticizing decisions you disagree with in Debian



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 09/22/2014 at 10:21 AM, Chris Bannister wrote:

> On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 09:56:43PM +0400, Reco wrote:
> 
>> In the light of the current discussion, this seems particulary 
>> fitting:
>> 
>> Social human behaviour experts
> 
> There is no such thing, not at least by that name. Anthropologists 
> spring to mind, but I think you don't mean it in that sense.
> 
> Perhaps you mean conflict resolution experts?

That line (and the two paragraphs following) were excerpted from the
link which followed afterwards:

https://wiki.debian.org/DebianForNonCoderContributors

It's the section header for one of the types of "non-coder contributors"
- - that is, roles in which Debian needs help which do not involve coding.
If the term is wrong or meaningless, that falls on whoever wrote that
page, not on Reco.

- -- 
   The Wanderer

The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one
persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all
progress depends on the unreasonable man.         -- George Bernard Shaw
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=qKYS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: